The Defendants dismissed the application for compensation filed by the applicant for compensation.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: Defendant B and Defendant A married around 1991 but divorced by agreement around 2001.

Defendants were able to believe the necessity of hospitalization for the insured, the appropriateness of the period of hospitalization, and the written confirmation of hospitalization issued by a hospital only, and to provide insurance money to the insured with sufficient pains and pharmacologic using the life and terms and conditions of an insurance company, which provides that they may be able to provide insurance money to the insured, but they were unable to receive insurance money by means of hospitalization or hospitalization exceeding the adequate period of hospitalization, etc., for their minor diseases, even though they are not required for hospital treatment due to sufficient conditions of hospital treatment.

A. Defendant B was hospitalized in the D convalescent hospital located in Macheon-si on October 29, 2007 as a result of diagnosis of urine disease. Although the hospitalized treatment was appropriate for 14 days, Defendant B was hospitalized in excess of 31 days until November 28, 2007 in order to get out of insurance money due to excess hospitalization, and was hospitalized in the victim’s future on November 29, 2007, and received insurance money of 9.60,000 won of insurance money on December 24, 2007 from October 29, 2007 to October 8, 2014, Defendant B received insurance money of 4215,745,436 won in total from 7 insurance companies, such as three life insurance companies, etc. in the victim’s future over 58 times in total.

As a result, the defendant was informed of the victims, and received each property.

B. Defendant A was hospitalized in the Dong Mancheon-si Hospital that was at the time of Macheon-si on September 27, 2007 under the name of an hystyposis and systye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye.