beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of reasons for appeal: The punishment sentenced by the court below (eight months of imprisonment) which was unfair in sentencing is too unreasonable.
2. On September 23, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) in a public order branch of the Daejeon District Court on September 23, 2016, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment on October 1, 2016, and only six months, which became final and conclusive, committed a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act as indicated in the judgment below. All of the remaining crimes were committed during the suspended sentence of imprisonment. The Defendant had the record of five criminal punishment and twelve juvenile protective disposition, including the above criminal record, and the Defendant’s record of these criminal records, etc., that the Defendant is highly likely to repeat a crime.
It is inevitable to see that the defendant is not in order to drive because there is no driver's license, but it is not good to see that there is no front number plate.
Although the above vehicle appears to be a vehicle, in light of the fact that it is difficult for the defendant to accept the above change of the vehicle in light of the criminal punishment three times due to driving without a license and the records of three times juvenile protective dispositions, the defendant's actual occurrence of the victim due to the defendant's violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, the damage was not recovered, and the social side effects of the Bossing crime are imposed on the transferor of the approaching medium as the defendant. In light of the fact that the defendant all of the crimes of this case are recognized and the defendant did not have the same criminal record, the punishment imposed by the court below is too somewhat somewhat less light even considering the fact that the defendant is not guilty.
Ackless fluoritely,
shall not be deemed to exist.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and the Criminal Procedure Act is applicable.