1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) on the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows: (a) the "Evidence No. 1 through 6" of the first instance court No. 4 of the first instance court's judgment No. 4 is dismissed by "No. 1 through 8 (including paper numbers)"; and (b) the "No. 4 is denied by the first instance court's "No. 11"; (c) the plaintiff submitted a confirmation of facts (Evidence No. 15) by the operator of a nearby beauty room (Evidence No. 15) that confirms that he/she resides in the building of this case; (d) although the above He/she heard the plaintiff's unilateral position and confirmed his/her residence, he/she prepared and corrected additional facts (Evidence No. 7) with the purport that it is corrected by mistake, it is identical to the reasons for the first instance judgment except for adding "a list" as stated in the first instance court's "attached Form No. 1".

2. As such, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and all appeals against the Plaintiff’s principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed as it is without merit. It is obvious that “the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff)” in the disposition of the court of first instance is omitted in the subsequent sheet, and it is obvious that “the building indicated in the attached list is omitted.” It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.