1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the head of Busan Busan Metropolitan City and the defendant Korea Asset Management Corporation are ancillary.

Details of the disposition

The head of Busan Busan District Government (hereinafter “the head of Busan District Government”) delegated by the Minister of Strategy and Finance (hereinafter “the Ministry of Strategy and Finance”) with the authority of the Minister of Strategy and Finance (hereinafter “the Ministry of Strategy and Finance”) to perform the affairs concerning the management, etc. of the Busan District B large 466.5 square meters, which is State property. The head of Busan District Government deemed that the Plaintiff occupied the above land without permission 37.9 square meters (hereinafter “the State property of this case”). From around 192 to 2006, the head of Busan District Government imposed on the Plaintiff the State property compensation every year from around 192 to 2006.

The head of the defendant Busan District Office did not pay the above indemnity, and attached Form No. 22, February 22, 2005, owned by the plaintiff

1. A disposition of seizing the real estate recorded in the list (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

On June 30, 2006, the Minister of Strategy and Finance entrusted the management of state property, such as the above land, to the Korea Asset Management Corporation.

Defendant Korea Asset Management Corporation deemed that the Plaintiff occupied the State property of this case without permission, and imposed the Plaintiff the compensation for State property every year from around 2007 to 2018.

Defendant Korea Asset Management Corporation did not pay the above indemnity, seized the instant real estate on July 22, 2009, and seized the instant real estate on November 7, 2018.

(2) The plaintiff's action against the head of Busan District Office and the plaintiff's preliminary action against the defendant Korea Asset Management Corporation are legitimate. The plaintiff's action against the head of Busan District Office as well as the plaintiff's preliminary action against the defendant Korea Asset Management Corporation is legitimate. The plaintiff's action against the head of Busan District Office is legitimate. The plaintiff's action against Gap 1, 3, 16, 23, Eul 2 through 5, Eul 2 and 1 (including the provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply) is legitimate.