1. The part concerning defendant F among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked.

2. The plaintiff's action against the defendant F shall be dismissed.

3...

1. Basic facts

A. In around 2001, the Plaintiff established several stores within the Seoul subway station, and entered into a lease agreement with the Korea National Tourism Organization for each shop. The Korea National Tourism Organization is the Defendant A Co., Ltd. (the trade name before the change is N.).

hereinafter referred to as “Defendant A”

(2) Even after the contract term of the above lease contract expires, Defendant A et al. filed a lawsuit against Defendant A et al. to seek the name of each shop, and the Plaintiff was sentenced to some winnings in the first instance trial (Seoul Central District Court 2003Gahap67217, 2003Gahap6724, 2003Gahap6986, 2003Gahap66986, 2003Gahap67194, 2003Gahap67200).

3) Accordingly, Defendant A et al. filed an appeal. In each appellate trial, each of the appeals appeals filed by Defendant A et al., each of which became final and conclusive that “Defendant A succeeds to the tenant status of each of the above stores of the Korea National Tourism Organization, extended the term of the lease to July 31, 2007, and Defendant A orders each of the Plaintiff upon the expiration of the term of the lease to order each of the respective stores.”

2) Accordingly, Defendant A filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff seeking the exclusion of executive force of the part ordering the name map among the above executive titles as Seoul Central District Court 2007Gahap67185, which was the Seoul Central District Court’s 207Gahap67185. The above court rendered a decision recommending reconciliation with the following content as of February 12, 2008 (hereinafter “decision recommending reconciliation of this case”).

(b).