logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.08.29 2017가단35362
제3자이의
Text

1. The Defendant’s order for payment against Nonparty B is authentic in the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2017Hu423958.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

2. The judgment deeming confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act, and the Defendant submitted a written reply as of March 13, 2018, but only sought a judgment dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim, and did not give any reply to the facts alleged by the Plaintiff as the cause of the claim and did not appear on the date for pleading, and thus, it constitutes the time when the Plaintiff did not clearly dispute the facts alleged by the Plaintiff (see Supreme Court Decision 89Meu4045, Jul. 25, 1989).

arrow