logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.10 2020가단5011202
사용료
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part demanding the payment of KRW 101,500 shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

(However, "creditor" is deemed to be "Plaintiff", and "debtor" to be "defendant". 2. 2. The judgment by confession is delivered with the original copy of the payment order in this case, and the defendant only submitted a simple written objection that does not dispute the plaintiff's dismissal of the claim or the cause of the claim, but did not submit a subsequent reply, and the plaintiff did not appear at the date of pleading, so it is deemed to have led to the confession of all the plaintiff's assertion in accordance with Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. The part dismissing part of the Plaintiff sought payment of KRW 101,500 to the Defendant regarding the demand procedure related to the application for the instant payment order, but the amount disbursed as the litigation cost can be repaid after the judgment became final and conclusive, and there is no benefit to seek a separate lawsuit (Supreme Court Decision 9Da68577 delivered on May 12, 200), and this part of the lawsuit is unlawful.

arrow