logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.03.26 2018가단59398
건물명도 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the real estate stated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

On June 3, 2011, the Plaintiff leased the instant real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”) to the Defendant on June 3, 201, with the lease deposit of KRW 10 million, KRW 900,000,000 per month, and the lease period from June 25, 201 to June 25, 2012 (hereinafter “instant lease”) and then delivered the instant real estate to the Defendant at that time. The fact that the instant lease agreement provides that two or more lease periods are the grounds for termination of the contract; the Defendant delayed payment of two or more rents; the fact that the duplicate of the complaint of this case stating the Plaintiff’s intention to terminate the instant lease contract on the grounds of the Defendant’s delay was delivered to the Defendant on December 3, 2018 is recognized by the evidence stated in subparagraphs 1 through 5.

Therefore, the instant lease contract terminated on December 3, 2018, and thus, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff.

arrow