The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two years of imprisonment with prison labor for six months and twenty hours of an order to attend a lecture) is too unreasonable;

2. The judgment is based on the following: (a) the Defendant divided the Defendant’s mistake into one, and complained for the Defendant’s health that is not good; (b) the Defendant presented another person’s identification card to conceal the instant crime; (c) the Defendant has been punished three times as fines for the same type of crime; and (d) the Defendant’s intention for compliance driving, such as re-acquisition of a driver’s license since the cancellation of the driver’s license in 2008, is weak, it cannot be said that the Defendant selected the Defendant to be sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor, but the lower court’s punishment added to the compliance driving order is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.