(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.02.29 2014고단2002

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.02.29 2014고단2002

횡령

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 2012, the Defendant imported the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the other part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part

Nevertheless, the Defendant violated his duties and sold the above garments to the clothing company, such as E, F, and G, which is located in E, F, and L, from October 12, 2012 to October 23, 2013, she sold the above garments to Ha, and then transferred USD 86,505 to Ha for personal debt repayment, thereby obtaining the financial benefits of USD 86,505 equivalent to the same amount to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness D, and the witness I's partial statement;

1. Entry of the witness C in the second public trial records, and entry of the witness H in the third public trial records;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect A by the prosecution (including the part concerning H's statement);

1. Three-time protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect A by the police (including the C's statement);

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. The defendant and the defense counsel do not have a position to handle the affairs to be kept by the victim C, and they do not instruct D to transfer the sales proceeds of the clothing supply unit to H.

In light of the above evidence, the Defendant borrowed 200,000 dollars from H to the victim around April 2012 in the process of importing Luxembourg the clothing raw materials from H, and the Defendant and the victim caused difficulties in customs clearance and sales of the clothing raw materials around September 2012.

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2018.06.28 2018고합40

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.07.10 2017고단1106

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.27 2015고단8284

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.28 2017고정2405

-부산지방법원 서부지원 2018.06.01 2017고단804