logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.04.03 2012고단11567
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CYF rocketing car.

On November 3, 2012, the Defendant driven the above car on November 11:40, 2012, and driven the two-lanes of the road in front of the 445-5 two apartment complexes, Jung-gu, Incheon, Seogu, Seo-gu, Busan, in the speed of about 10 km from the side of the two apartment complexes to the new apartment complex at the speed of about 10 km.

At the same time, a crosswalk with signal lights is installed, so there was a duty of care to safely drive the crosswalk in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, although the defendant neglected this, he did not avoid the victim D(56) who passed the crosswalk from the right side of the driver's vehicle to the left side of the defendant's driver's vehicle due to the negligence of driving the bicycle, and did not avoid the victim D(56) who passed the crosswalk from the right side of the driver's vehicle.

After all, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as the first step and the first step of 11 chest pressure, which require approximately eight weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (including cases where: (a) agreement is made on March 12, 2013 with the victim and the Defendant on March 12, 2013; (b) the victim is seeking the Defendant’s wife; (c) the victim is purchasing a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance policy; (d) there is no history of criminal punishment; and (e) the Defendant’s statement that he/she should retire according to the current rules of the workplace when he/she

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow