logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2017.11.07 2017나30375
임금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

(b).

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment similar to that of paragraph (2) to the allegations emphasized by the plaintiffs in this court.

2. Additional determination

A. Determination as to whether bonuses are included in ordinary wages or not, the plaintiffs asserted that the bonus in this case paid by the defendant should also be included in the calculation of ordinary wages with regular, daily, and fixed benefits. 2) The following facts and circumstances can be acknowledged by comprehensively considering the overall purport of arguments in each statement in Gap, Gap's 1 through 3, 6, 7, and Eul's 1 through 6 (including serial numbers), i.e., (i) the defendant shall pay bonuses to workers, including the plaintiffs, on a two-month basis, and the defendant shall pay the bonus only to the workers who were employed as of the payment date, and in fact, the fact that the workers who were employed as of the payment date did not pay the bonus was not paid the bonus to the workers who were employed as of the payment date, even if they were provided on the day of voluntary payment, if they were retired before the specific payment date, it can be viewed that the payment date of the bonus in this case's bonus in question lacks the time of payment due to changes in the collective agreement between the payment date and the fixed number of days (see, 200.

arrow