(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.12.04 2015고정216

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.12.04 2015고정216

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:00 on May 4, 2014, the Defendant had a dispute between the Defendant and E and F (the victim G G’s relative, Dong name, and Dong name) on the fifth floor D in the Gunsan-si, Si, Masan-si. The victim G (24 years of age) who attempted to take part in the E’s work, attempted to speak, had a face from the victim’s in mind, had a face from the victim’s mind. After that, H took the victim’s head debt, took the victim’s snow part in drinking, and led the victim’s head debt that the Defendant exceeded, and led the victim’s head outside the same drinking house.

As a result, the Defendant, in collaboration with H and a person with poor name, inflicted injury on the victim, such as the removal of the frame and floor of the victim in need of approximately four weeks of treatment, and the blood transfusion from credit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Protocol of each police statement concerning G;

1. A criminal investigation report (related to the submission of photographs of the victim's body);

1. Although the defendant denies that the victim did not assault the victim, the victim made a consistent statement from an investigative agency to this court consistently from the victim to the point of view, the victim reported the victim's face and clothes with his head debt at the time of the case, and made a statement that the defendant accurately memorys the defendant's face due to the division of conversations between the defendant and the defendant on the first floor after the fighting has been terminated. As such, the victim is not the victim was subject to violence and locked, but the victim could have been able to sufficiently memory the external appearance of the criminal after the fighting was terminated. The victim stated that the victim could have been aware that he could have been aware of the victim's face from the time of the first investigation to the time of the fighting, and that the victim was identified as the criminal offender through the one-way account, etc. of the E in the place of the fighting at the time of the fighting.

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2016.06.02 2015노1871

-대구지방법원 의성지원 2017.05.11 2016고정108

-부산지방법원 2009.6.9.선고 2008고단7609 판결

-서울서부지방법원 2017.10.26 2017노539

-대전지방법원 2017.09.13 2017노357