1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except where the court of the first instance renders a "judgment" of the 4th to 13th 6th 12 of the first instance judgment, and the 6th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 16th 20th 20th 10th 200th 10th 10th 206

“Labor contract document prepared at the time of the instant labor contract” (hereinafter “instant labor contract document”)

(1) In addition, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone states that “the term of the employment contract shall be from July 18, 2016 to July 17, 2018, and, in principle, labor relations shall be automatically terminated upon the expiration of the term of the contract: Provided, That the term may be extended by the agreement of the parties, but the term may be extended by the agreement of the parties)” and that the term of the contract has been fixed, as seen earlier. In addition, in full view of all the following circumstances known by the purport of Gap’s evidence Nos. 3, 4, 6, Eul’s evidence Nos. 2, 4, 6, 7 and evidence Nos. 7 (including the serial number) and witness D’s testimony and oral argument, the above term of the contract under the instant employment contract is merely a formal entry or is merely a non-fixed worker (hereinafter “regular worker”). Notwithstanding the above term of the contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant at the time of the instant

(1) The e-mail sent by the Defendant to the Plaintiff on June 16, 2016, stating that “the period of work shall be two years, and the annual salary shall be one year,” and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant granted the Plaintiff a trust in the instant employment contract.” Therefore, the e-mail sent by the Defendant to the Plaintiff on June 16, 2016, is based on the instant employment contract.”