logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.01.11 2018고정737
협박
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

Indictment

1. On April 20, 2018, the Defendant sent a text message to the Defendant’s office located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, on the ground that the victim C, who is an employee of the Defendant, was absent without permission, using the Defendant’s mobile phone, to the victim’s cell phone, stating that the victim’s cell phone “picked so far as he could have taken it up,” and that the victim’s cell phone was contacted before the end of the period, and that the victim’s his cell phone was not a school, but the victim’s his wife could have taken it off on the day of the month, and that the victim’s wife could have become aware of it on the day of the day of the month.”

2. 피고인은 2018. 4. 23. 15:14경 위 장소에서 위와 같은 이유로 피고인의 휴대폰을 이용하여 피해자의 휴대폰으로 "D이 학교랑 E 사무실(피해자가 거주하고 있는 아파트 자치위원회 사무실) 쫓아가서 난리칠라다 F이가 만류해서 꾹 참는다"라는 내용의 문자메시지를 보내 피해자를 협박하였다.

Judgment

Each of the above facts charged is a crime falling under Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's explicit intent pursuant to Article 283 (3) of the same Act. According to the records, the facts can be acknowledged that the victim withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant after the institution of the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 (6) of the

arrow