Text
1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months (the crime of paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) above) and for not less than three years.
Reasons
Criminal facts
Defendant
A on May 29, 2008, after having been sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Goyang Branch of the District Court, on August 2, 2008, the judgment became final and conclusive on August 2, 2008, and on January 22, 2009, on May 11, 2010, the District Court sentenced eight months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud and completed the execution of each of the respective punishments on May 11, 201.
1. Cases 2013 Highest 1851 (Defendant A);
A. On November 2006, the Defendant received a certificate of personal seal impression, a certified copy of resident registration, etc. from the victim, on the following purport: (a) “G” operated by the victim F, operated by the victim F, “G”; and (b) “If the victim lends his/her personal name to the victim for an accident of real estate, he/she shall be given KRW 500,000,000 if he/she leased the real estate to the victim, and shall be responsible for and paid after the purchase of the real estate by
However, at the time of fact, the defendant had approximately KRW 100 million, and only the four installments of the vehicle purchased in another person's name are equivalent to KRW 45.4 million, while there are no special property or income, there is no intention or ability to pay it properly even if the vehicle is purchased with the vehicle borrowed in the victim's name.
Nevertheless, on November 24, 2006, the Defendant purchased 1,950,000 won from the LG card by using the documents of the victim and did not pay the installments, and acquired property benefits equivalent to the said amount.
B. On December 23, 2006, the Defendant purchased and used one mobile phone (M) under the victim’s name, and did not pay 1,042,380 won in total, even if he/she did not change the mobile phone under the victim’s name, as in the preceding paragraph, and did not pay 1,042,380 won in subrogation to the victim even if he/she opened the mobile phone under the victim’s name.
In addition, the defendant from that time to February 2, 2007 is as shown in the attached list of crimes.