1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the judgment on F&C Co., Ltd. is revoked, and the Plaintiff’s Defendant Co., Ltd.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "Nos. 7 and 9 of the first instance court's ruling, Nos. 13, 19, 3, 8 and 11 of the first instance court's ruling, Nos. 20, 27 and 27 of the second instance court's ruling, "C&C" shall be deleted, "P&C" of the 15, 8 of the 15, and "No. 44 of the 17, 20," "No. 45 and 49 of Eul (including each number)," and "No. 22 of the 12, the first instance court's agreement on termination of the settlement of accounts is prepared voluntarily by internal employees of V and B of the first instance court's ruling, so the above settlement termination agreement is invalid, but there is no additional evidence to acknowledge it differently from the evidence of Gap's 28 of the 20th court's judgment's reasoning."

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is without merit. Since the part of the judgment of the court of first instance as to the defendant EffC is unfair with different conclusions, the defendant EffC's appeal is accepted, and it is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim as to EffC is dismissed, and the part as to the remaining defendants except the part as to EffC among the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant EffC is just. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants other than EffC is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.