The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case, and is against the defendant's living under confinement for four months. Considering each of the crimes of this case, the extent of damage caused by each of the crimes of this case cannot be said to be large, and the defendant caused each of the crimes of this case to raise funds for living expenses, etc.

However, each of the crimes of this case was committed by the defendant after he prepared the victim's house in advance, and then stolen or attempted to steals property by infringing upon the victim's house, taking into account the method and frequency of the crime, etc., the crime was considerably poor, and the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims up to the trial. In particular, on November 25, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum of four years and three years and six months for larceny, etc. at the Ulsan District Court on September 22, 2012, and was sentenced on September 22, 2012, which led to each of the crimes of this case. The circumstances favorable to the defendant were already considered in the court below, and there was no change in the defendant's age, character and behavior, status, environment, result, circumstances after the crime, etc., and there were no special circumstances or circumstances that can be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below. Thus, the defendant's assertion that the above defendant's punishment is unreasonable is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.