1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in the entry of Gap evidence 3, in Eul evidence 1, 2, and 4 (including additional numbers), together with the whole purport of the pleadings:

Plaintiff

On October 26, 2009, A was brought to the F Hospital affiliated with the Defendant, and at the time, “I complained of symptoms, such as a wooden pain, the right shoulder, the right-hand cat, the hand cat, etc., and returned back after receiving a medical examination from G by a physician.

On the 28th day of the same month, the Plaintiff was diagnosed that a doctor G needs an emergency operation after undergoing X-ray and MRI tests (the discovery of simple radioactive shields No. 5-6). On November 3, 199, the Plaintiff was subject to the 1st operation to remove conical signboards No. 5-6 from the Defendant’s doctor G and H, and inserting artificial conical signboards (hereinafter “the first operation”). However, the Plaintiff’s 1st operation was damaged during the recovery period, and the brain amount was leaked during the recovery period. C. The Defendant’s doctor conducted the ER to the Plaintiff for preservation. However, on November 1, 2009, the Plaintiff’s 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 0th day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 20th day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 3th day of the 2nd.

Even after the second operation, the plaintiff A complained of both arms and neck surgery units, and the defendant's doctors administered a medical control to the plaintiff A.

In addition, the plaintiff A was diagnosed to have been infected with cerebral resistant infection and administered antibiotics, etc.

E. On December 5, 2009, Plaintiff A recovered the ability to exercise, did not observe the amount of brain salvines any longer, and discharged Plaintiff A with symptoms, such as brain salvine infection.

F. However, even after the above, the plaintiff A gives medical treatment to the department of anesthesia medicine in the defendant hospital.