logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.21 2013고단5421
협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 25, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Central District Court.

5856 decided May 6, 2013

1. On January 201, the Defendant: (a) from time to time, at the coffee shop “D” in the Gu, during the Gyeyang-gu period, the Defendant called, “B, while leaving G University to go up and living together with G University, present apartment city events are held. In doing so, the Defendant received documents from the bank to obtain a PF loan and received documents from the bank to obtain an apartment in the Gyeongbuk-dong; (b) the financial situation is not temporarily good; (c) the lending of business funds, such as office expenses, including office expenses, is changed until the full payment is made.”

However, the Defendant thought that the Defendant would use the funds borrowed from the victim as his own living expenses, not the business funds, and did not properly implement apartment execution projects or PE loans, so there was no intention or ability to repay the funds to the victim even if he borrowed the funds as above.

Around January 11, 2011, the Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 500,000 from the victim for office expenses, and acquired KRW 88,200,000 in total over 34 times, as shown in the annexed List of Crimes.

Attached Form

The total amount of damage is KRW 300,000 and the total amount of damage is KRW 88,200,000.

The order of dismissal 2013dan5421

2. From the beginning of July 2011, the Defendant borrowed money from the victim E (n, 41 years of age) while entering into an internal relationship with the victim, and caused the victim to be subject to criminal complaint due to fraud around April 2012, the Defendant stated that, around July 6, 2012, in order to have the victim withdraw the criminal complaint, the Defendant would inform the victim of the fact that “if the victim did not withdraw the criminal complaint, the husband would know the victim,” and that, around July 20, 2012, the Defendant would have the victim revoked the criminal complaint against the victim.

arrow