logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.20 2017나35648
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: "B" No. 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except as "B" is the attorney-at-law in charge of authentication of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

(1) The plaintiff's appeal is not significantly different from the plaintiff's argument in the first instance court, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court is different from the witness G at the trial, the court of first instance's fact-finding and decision are justifiable). 2. The plaintiff's claim should be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court of first instance.

arrow