A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at the Daegu District Court on October 2, 2008, issued a summary order of a fine of 500,000 won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, and on December 18, 2009, the Defendant violated the duty of prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol two times or more by receiving a summary order of a fine of 4 million won for the same crime from the same court.

On June 21, 2017, the Defendant driven a D Twork Motor Vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.124% at a section of about 10km from the section of approximately 10km to the 10km in front of the Guju Living Health Road in Daegu-dong, Daegu-ro, Daegu-do. On June 21, 2017, the Defendant driven a D Twork Motor Vehicle with alcohol content of about 0.124%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, investigation report, and summary order-making statute, such as criminal history;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (or choice of imprisonment);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include the frequency and time when the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, the concentration of alcohol in blood at the time of driving the drinking of this case, the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., as stated in the arguments of this case, shall be determined as ordered by considering the various factors for sentencing as stated in the argument of this case.