logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2014.06.27 2013고합65
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013Gohap65]

1. Fraud to victims E;

A. A. On May 11, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E at the Sdong article restaurant of 188-1, Jindong-ri, Dong-ri, Dong-ri, Dong-ri, that “I will pay interest on a loan of KRW 2 million.”

However, at the time, the defendant did not have any particular property and did not have any job, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to pay it.

Thus, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 2,000,000 won from the victim's seat.

B. Around May 17, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E at the same place as the above paragraph (a) stating that “The Defendant was the representative director of the Posco sub-project and the Masco sub-project, who was employed in the Posco, changed the amount of KRW 2.8 million as entertainment expenses that would enable the ASEAN to find employment.”

However, in fact, the defendant was not the representative director of the Switzerland's subordinate business, and even if the defendant received money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to find employment of the victim's children in Switzerland.

Therefore, the Defendant, as seen above, deceiving the victim and received KRW 2,00,000 on the same day from the victim, and acquired KRW 18,164,838 in total over 10 times from that time to August 2009 by the same method.

C. On July 18, 2009, at the same place as the above paragraph (a) above, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, “A 4th floor building in front of the F Bank, which is located in Jeonju, may be loaned by the F Bank on the first floor in order to obtain a loan of KRW 200 million (such building as mortgage). The Defendant may obtain a loan from the F Bank that “a person who lives for life by obtaining a loan for marriage.”

However, in fact, the above building was under the name of the defendant, and it was difficult to make additional loans due to the excess of the secured amount.

arrow