1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. Basic facts

A. A. A school juristic person D (hereinafter “D”) completed the registration of ownership transfer based on donation on October 3, 1945 with respect to the instant land on September 10, 1950, the registration of ownership transfer based on the Defendant’s father E, the Defendant’s father, on March 26, 1962, on the said land, due to the completion of repayment on November 5, 1961; on August 9, 1989, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer based on a division of inherited property as of June 1, 1983.

B. Since around 1986, the Defendant owned the land of this case as the site for the building of this case, the Defendant owned the land of this case as the site for the building of this case, with the indication 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 5 of the land of this case, which are linked in sequence with each of the above points of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 of the annexed drawings among the land of this case, and owned the land of this case as the site for the building of this case.

[Ground of recognition] The absence of dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1, 6, and 7 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of on-site verification conducted by the court of first instance, the result of the survey and appraisal conducted by the appraiser F of the first instance court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the principal lawsuit

A. 1) The summary of the plaintiff's claim is that the farmland distribution disposition on the above land is null and void because the land in this case is not the land actually used for farming at the time when the Farmland Reform Act enters into force. The above land is still owned D. The registration of ownership transfer made in the name of the defendant's father E, and the registration of ownership transfer in the defendant's name based thereon should be cancelled. Since the plaintiff purchased the land in this case from D on December 23, 1986, the defendant is liable to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration on the above land to the plaintiff on December 23, 1986. 2) It is only written in Gap evidence 2-1 through 3 (each receipt).