Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant worked at “E”, which is a manufacturer of DNA operation, from June 2012 to December of the same year.
At around 15:30 on October 1, 2013, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the Busan District Court 201, the Busan District Court 201, the Busan District Court 201, the Plaintiff Co., Ltd., 23729, and Defendant D’s claim for the payment of goods, and took an oath.
In fact, the Defendant did not know whether D’s request for return of approximately 9,000 kilograms from among 14,987kg, which was supplied from the exchangecom pound on August 2012, 201, and all of them were returned to the exchangecom pound. In short, the Defendant did not know whether D’s ice material, which was not returned at the end of December 2012, when D’s closing of work, remains in the open container used as the material storage place.
Nevertheless, the Defendant testified that the Defendant’s agent testified that “I have made certain products with ice material not returned to the Defendant,” that “I had the ice material supplied by the Plaintiff Company not later than before the Defendant left the factory at the end of December, 2012.”
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised a perjury.
Of the facts charged, with respect to ① “The Defendant’s production of raw materials at the summer 2012, demanded a witness to submit KRW 700-800 to 80 million, and the witness, who was unable to believe the Defendant, directly wired KRW 40 million to the Defendant’s Ho Industrial Complex, which is the Defendant’s supply company for the return of the heading material, and in the process, he became aware of the fact that the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to return the heading material.” ② ② “I made the heading,” ③ made the heading, and sold the heading, which was made in G and H, and made the heading, in which the Defendant had made the farm use heading, and the heading made the heading, with the statement in the investigation agency or this court, to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt on the fact that the Defendant made a false statement contrary to memory.”