logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.05.25 2014가단51894
손해배상(기)
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff, Defendant A, Defendant F, Defendant F, KRW 7,310,00,00, and Defendant G, KRW 3,505,00, and each of them.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff asserts as the ground of the claim in this case as shown in the annexed Form “the ground of claim”.

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant A, F, and G is deemed to have led to the confession of the Plaintiff’s claim in accordance with Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, Defendant A is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from November 4, 2014 to the day following the delivery of a copy of a complaint against the above Defendant, as requested by the Plaintiff, as to the Plaintiff, Defendant A is KRW 14,960,00, Defendant F is KRW 7,310,000, Defendant G is KRW 3,505,000, and each of them is claimed by the Plaintiff. Defendant A is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from November 4, 2014 to the day of full payment, which is the day following the delivery of a copy of a complaint against the above Defendant.

3. Determination as to claims against Defendant B, C, D, and E

A. (i) On June 201, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Gangdong-gu Office for the collection and transportation of domestic wastes, and is an agency for collecting and transporting domestic wastes from the Sungdong-gu, Dongdong-dong, Dongdong-dong, and Dong-dong.

In addition, the plaintiff and the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ordinance on Waste Management and the above agency contract sell the standard plastic garbage bags manufactured by the plaintiff to the Gangdong-gu Office for waste-generating business establishments, etc., but the plaintiff paid the cost of manufacturing and treating the plastic garbage out of the above sales amount to the Gangdong-gu office. As to some food wastes, the plaintiff entered into a contract for food waste disposal with the restaurant, etc. which is a food waste discharging business establishment, and discharged food wastes in a general container which is not a standard plastic garbage bag in a restaurant, etc., and paid the plaintiff the cost of collecting and transporting the food waste based on the monthly amount of food waste discharged, and the plaintiff paid 30% of the cost paid to the restaurant, etc

arrow