1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on April 25, 2016 on the case No. 2014Da3005 is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Basic facts

가. 이 사건 등록서비스표 1) 등록번호/ 출원일/ 등록일 : 서비스표등록 C/ D/ E 2) 구성 : 3) 지정서비스업 : 서비스업 구분 제41류의 교육정보제공업, 교재출판업, 서적출판업, 저널출판업, 개인교수업, 교수업, 교육시험업, 교육연구업, 다도(茶道 지도업, 실습훈련업, 심포지엄 준비 및 진행업, 요리지도업, 인터넷교육강좌업, 인터넷교육지도업, 제과제빵기술지도업, 직업교육훈련지도업, 칵테일학원경영업, 통신강좌업, 위성통신강좌업, 인터넷을 이용한 교육시험업

(b) Marks 1: 2) Goods/services used: Food, coffee, coffee manufacturing and processing, coffee wholesale, coffee retail service and coffee trade, electronic commerce, coffee education and consultation service: the Plaintiff;

C. On November 24, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a petition for a invalidation trial against the Defendant on November 25, 2014, on the ground that “The registered service mark of this case is identical or similar to the registered service mark known as the mark of a specific person in Korea, and the designated service business is also related, and consumers are confused with the source of the service business and thus, consumers are confused. In addition, the registered service mark of this case is filed with the Defendant, who was a participant of the Plaintiff’s “FFFFFFFFFFFF,” knowing the reputation of the registered service mark, and filed for a invalidation trial against the registered service mark of this case with the Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board on April 25, 2016, on the ground that “The registered service mark of this case is filed for an unjust purpose with the Plaintiff’s reputation and reputation of the registered service mark, and is likely to undermine public order.”