The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the bus drivers of Seoul Metropolitan Government, who are members of the branch office B of the Korea Automobile Union bus trade union B, and the victims C are the heads of the above branch offices. Meanwhile, the members of the above branch are members of the NAD.

피고인은 2017. 9. 23. 08:55 경 서울시 이하 불상지에서, 위 ‘D ’에 “ 조합 동지 여러 분! 무능한 B 어용지부장이 부서장 및 측근들과 조합비 펑펑 쓰면서 충남 태안으로 낚시 갔습니다.

(b) The author’s places in the cooperative’s fee and are very bad to scarbly fallen.

(b) Although it is not easy for ordinary members to deduct once a day due to the absence of a person, the number of people is deducted, and the number of people is different.

I have the honor to do so, as Istanis and Istanis.

all us siba siba siba

The head of the fish site shall do so.

“.......”

However, in order to promote friendship with the members of the association, only the fact that the victim has spent the expenses for fishing and did not use the expenses for fishing for the sake of fishing travel.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by publicly expressing false facts through information and communications networks with the aim of slandering the victim.

2. Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.: A judgment dismissing a victim’s non-permanent declaration of intent on December 28, 2017, which was after the institution of public prosecution under Article 70 (3) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)