logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.09.08 2016고단2564
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 12, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court on November 12, 2012, and a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime at the same court on January 7, 2013, respectively, and violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act twice.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On May 29, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) driving a B T-Ra motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.186% without obtaining a driver’s license from the front side of the west-gu Seoul Northern-dong, Daegu-dong, to the front side of the gkm-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong, Daegu-dong, the Defendant driven a B-Ra motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of about 7km without obtaining a driver’s license.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a Bart car.

The Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.186% without a driver’s license as above on the date and time stated in the foregoing paragraph 1, and driven the said car along the three-lane road in front of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seonam-dong Seocho-dong in accordance with two-lanes from the right parallel parallel to the zymmetric distance.

At night, there are vehicles stopping in front of the defendant's moving direction, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents due to the driver of the vehicle's vehicle and the driver's duty of care by maintaining a sufficient interval between the vehicle and the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to proceed with it, and was driven by the victim C(the age of 45) who stops due to the signal signal signal in the front section of the said T-Ra car, with the front part of the said T-Ra car.

Accordingly, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim C, such as salt, tensions, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above.

arrow