Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 6, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of 3,500,000 won by a military court common at the 6th common military branch of the army on the ground that he/she violated road traffic laws (drinking), and was sentenced to a fine of 3,50,000 won for a violation of road traffic laws (drinking) at the Jung-gu District Court on January 8, 2016.
1. On May 16, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving without a license) even though there was a history of violating the prohibition of drinking at least twice as above, the Defendant driven CM5 automobiles without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of approximately 14km alcohol concentration from the road front of the Do-si, the Do-si, the Do-dong, the Do-si, the Do-si, the Do-si, the Do-dong, the Do-dong, the Do-dong, the Do-dong, the Do-dong, the Do-dong, the Do-dong, the
2. No owner of a motor vehicle that violates the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle on a road unless mandatory insurance is purchased;
Nevertheless, the Defendant owned the CM5 car and operated the MF5 car on the road, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.
Summary of Evidence
1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;
1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;
1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;
1. The driver's license ledger of a motor vehicle (including an inquiry into the 13rd mandatory insurance attached thereto);
1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, a summary order, and the application of the text of the judgment;
1. Articles 148-2(1)1, 44(1)1, 152 subparag. 1, and 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 46(2)2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;
1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The defendant has reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.