A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 8, 2019, at around 09:06, the Defendant took a bath in a large lux of the third floor of Daejeon, the third floor of Daejeon, namely, the sobb "Cp" in a large lux of the third floor of Daejeon, and unloaded the automatic level of labelling at that place, etc. In addition, the Defendant was demanded to stop from the Railroad Police Station Da (n, 24 years old), to which the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport belongs, during the maintenance of order in the large lux, and to leave the area. As such, the Defendant sawed, “Fhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order in the station of D, a railroad worker.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on investigation, process, and photograph of the place of occurrence of the case;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on statements by witnesses;

1. Article 78 (1) and Article 49 (2) of the Railroad Safety Act applicable to criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, including the fact that the defendant, who recognized the crime of this case, is against the recognition of the criminal act of this case, the degree and attitude of obstructing the execution of duties, seems not to be a significant letter, and there is no past record of criminal punishment exceeding imprisonment since 2011, and the fact that it seems that the defendant would not intend to commit the crime of this case without mental restraint, are likely to commit the crime of this case, shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the various factors of sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments,