logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.02.02 2016가단18756
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The Plaintiff, while requesting the repair of a vehicle (Denz C63, hereinafter referred to as “instant vehicle”) to CV company operated by the Defendant, sought payment by asserting that the Plaintiff suffered losses, such as repair cost, etc. due to the Defendant’s failure to repair.

As to this, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff only requested the repair of the vehicle of this case to E, and the defendant does not request the defendant to do so.

However, it is insufficient to recognize that Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 merely requested the repair of the instant vehicle from the plaintiff, not E, or that the defendant should be held liable as the nominal lender.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow