logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.07.14 2017고단538
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. When the Defendant came to know that the victim D, who operates the said company, was seeking to find an investor due to the financial difficulties of C&A, he had the intent to acquire money by deceiving the victim as if he had the ability to invest in the said company.

The Defendant, around June 2013, operated the public interest foundation called “E” and “F” to the victim on the basis of the Investment Finance Company and “E”. The Defendant would introduce G(H) to the victim.

The amount equivalent to KRW 200 billion will be invested in the Republic of Korea. "After birth of the victim's recovery, G presents two copies of the KRW 1 billion check to the victim at the J hotel located in Seoul around August 26, 2013, G presents two copies of the KRW 1 billion check to the victim, and the defendant needs to pay KRW 2.3 billion to the Japanese Embassy in order to bring KRW 160 billion to Korea.

First of all, 30 million won, in combination with two chapters of this KRW 1 billion check, paid KRW 2.3 billion to the Japanese Embassy, and thereafter, “The above KRW 160 billion will be invested to C Co., Ltd.”, and after making a false statement to the purport that G would invest KRW 160 billion to the victim, G drafted an investment agreement and a loan agreement with the purport that it will invest KRW 160 billion to the victim.

However, in fact, G did not have to hold funds of KRW 160 billion in Japan, and even if it received money from the injured party, it did not have the intention or ability to pay it as a fee to the Embassy of Japan, or to invest KRW 160 billion in C Co., Ltd.

Nevertheless, the Defendant and G received KRW 300,000,000 from the victim, i.e., the sum of KRW 100,000 from the victim, i.e., the KRW 300,000,000,000 from G for introduction.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim in collusion with G.

2. On April 26, 2014, the Defendant donated the victim D’s “a person G (H) who has invested in a lux special performance organized by the unification doctrine” to the victim D.

arrow