logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2017.06.07 2017고정131
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 25, 2006, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Guarantee of Compensation for Automobile Damages was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not more than six months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the port support of the Daegu District Court. On December 1, 201, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for the same crime at the same court.

On November 1, 2015, the Defendant driven a D New EF rocketing car not covered by mandatory insurance in a state of alcohol leveling to approximately 200 meters from a section of approximately 00 meters from blood alcohol level to a three-way road located in C hospital located in B at the port in the north-gu, Mapo-si, Pyeong-si, Yangyang-dong, both of which are located in the north-gu, North-si, Mapo-si.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act is a person engaging in driving a D New EF rocketing car.

On November 1, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.090% among blood transfusions on November 1, 2015, and driven the road of four-lanes in front of C Hospital C Hospital located in North-gu, North Korea at the port of port at the port along one-lane from the distance of both study to the distance of large diving.

At the time, there was a motor vehicle that stops for signal waiting at night and at the front time, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents in advance by reducing speed and accurately operating the steering direction and brake system by properly examining the left and right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded as it is, due to the negligence of the Defendant, got a driver behind the FK 5 taxi driven by the victim E who was under a stop in accordance with the new subparagraph at a one-lane, and received a driver behind the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant destroyed the above K5 taxi to the extent of 678,102 won, such as the start-up of the Defendant following the above occupational negligence, and at the same time suffered approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim G and the victim H.

arrow