The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

The request of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the defendant, who is the chief director of the D school, and the victim C is the chief director of the E school and the F church members of the F church, and G is the victim's deceptive act, which is the above E school principal and the above E school director.

On June 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) leased four floors adjacent to the I fire station to G, the principal of the above school, at the Busan Southern-gu H school entrance presentation meeting; (b) sold them in lots.

If there is interest, it would be said that the school will move, and around 18:00 on June 29, 2014, G would be "I am on the low level, but I am on the lower parking lot of the Busan JGG in Busan, Busan, that I am on the building so that I am on the building.

Before the change of mind, if you do not enter into a contract on the one hand, they will not be leased.

Urging “,” and, on June 29, 2014, around 20:00, at the same frequency as the trade name in the Down-gu Busan Sungpo-gu, Busan, the victim C and G, and “I would like to obtain the building. I will do so;

If one floor is leased, the deposit amount shall be 300 million won, and if two floors are leased, the deposit shall be 500 million won, and monthly rent and management expenses shall not be collected.

On July 11, 2014, the court prepared a lease agreement with the victim and G on December 28, 2013, which was concluded between the defendant and the victim on December 28, 2013 at the Busan East-dong Office located in Busan-ro 112, Busan-do, Busan-ro, Busan-do, 112, and the defendant bears all the interior works of the school facilities of the 10th and the 10th and the 30 million won of the lease deposit against the victim and the 10th and the 10th and the 10th and upper floors of the building in Busan-gu, Busan-do.

However, in fact, on December 28, 2013, which the defendant shown to the victim, the contract for self-lease was cancelled and invalidated because the defendant did not pay any balance, and ② the contract for lease newly concluded in the order of April 2014 is prohibited from sub-lease without the consent of the lessor.