The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles did not inflict an injury on the victim, and even if the defendant abused the victim.

Even if the injured party's wife does not constitute an injury in the crime of injury.

B. The sentence of the lower court that is unfair in sentencing (one million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

(The defense counsel's written opinion on June 23, 2016 submitted after the expiration of the period for submitting the written reason for appeal shall be determined only to the extent that it supplements the reasons for appeal specified in the reason for appeal by the latter on March 11, 2016).

2. Determination on the misapprehension of facts and misapprehension of legal principles

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, it can be recognized that the defendant caused the victim's entrance and coin part by fingers to the injury of the victim and the knife of the knife in need of treatment within 2 weeks.

나. 또 한 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들을 종합하면, 피해자를 진료한 의사 H은 피해자를 진료할 당시 얼굴에 할퀸 자국이 있었고, 2 차적 감염의 가능성이 있어 연고를 바르는 등 처치를 하면서 일정기간 관찰이 필요한 상태였으며, 이에 피해자에게 항생제 연고를 처방하였고, 피해자가 입은 상해는 2 주간의 치료가 필요한 정도라고 판단한 사실을 인정할 수 있는 바, 위 인정사실에 의하면 피고인이 피해자에게 가한 상해는 피해자의 피해자의 건강상태를 불량하게 변경한 것으로서 상해죄에서의 상해에 해당한다.

(c)

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. It is recognized that there is a minor letter of injury suffered by the victim for determination of the unfair argument of sentencing, that the defendant is aged, that the defendant has been punished for the same crime, but that the defendant has been punished for about 29 years prior to the same crime.

However, the defendant denies and does not oppose the crime of this case, and the defendant agrees with the victim or damages.