logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원동부지원 2019.06.13 2018가단222268
청구이의
Text

1. The defendant's payment order against the plaintiff was based on the Busan District Court's Busan District Court's 2017Hu24776.

Reasons

1. The fact that C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Non-Party Co., Ltd.") filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff for the claim for the use of credit cards, and "the plaintiff shall pay 9,400,812 won and 4,143,682 won to the non-party Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "non-party Co., Ltd.") at the rate of 29% per annum from April 10, 207 to the date of full payment." The fact that the decision of performance recommendation became final on May 15, 207 (Evidence 1 to 4) that the non-party Co., Ltd. received 1 to the non-party Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "non-party Co., Ltd.") and received the above order of attachment and collection against the plaintiff Co. 3 obligor on June 22, 2010; the non-party Co., Ltd. transferred the above claim to the plaintiff Co. 2, Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "non-party Co. 2") on Sep. 36, Ltd.

2. The Defendant’s claim that became final and conclusive through the instant decision on the execution recommendation of the instant case shall be abbreviated with the instant decision on the execution recommendation for convenience.

whether the person is a legitimate transferee.

A. The defendant's assertion by the parties concerned is the final transferee of the claim for decision on performance recommendation of this case, so as to suspend extinctive prescription.

arrow