1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 1, 2008, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Bangladesh as a foreigner of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh (hereinafter “the People’s Republic of Bangladesh”)’s nationality, and was changed to the status of non-professional employment (E-9) on September 1, 2008, and stayed for an extension of the period of stay on June 28, 2013, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on June 26, 2014.

B. On December 5, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be prejudicial to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

C. The Plaintiff appealed to the Minister of Justice on December 16, 2014, but the said objection was dismissed on July 1, 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a white-brush, in the form of Magari, which is from the Dohaka of Bangladesh, and is a white-brush.

Violences belonging to the Awami Leasta (AwamI) were continuously threatened with the plaintiff's family in order to cut off the land of the plaintiff's family under the name of the plaintiff's large Awami.

On October 2012, around November 2012, the Plaintiff was injured due to a large fighting disaster between the Plaintiff’s family members and the Ethalthal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Ethal Estal Estal E

Therefore, in the event that the Plaintiff returned to Bangladesh, even though there is a risk of stuffing from the violence of the Plaintiff’s family members, seeking to deprive the land of the Plaintiff’s family, the instant disposition taken on a different premise is unlawful.

나. 관계 법령 ▣ 난민법 제2조 (정의) 이 법에서 사용하는 용어의...