All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant was in a state of mental disability under the influence of alcohol at the time of each of the instant crimes.

B. The Defendant asserts that, with respect to an unreasonable sentencing (one year of imprisonment, confiscation) of the lower court’s imprisonment, the Defendant is too unlimited, and the prosecutor argues that it is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. In full view of various circumstances, such as the circumstances leading up to each of the instant crimes, the means and methods of committing a crime, and the circumstances after committing a crime, which may be recognized by the records of the instant case as to the claim of mental retardation, it is recognized that the Defendant was in a somewhat drunk state at the time of committing the crime, but there was no ability to discern things or make decisions.

It does not seem that there was or was a weak state.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's assertion is rejected.

3. The Defendant’s special injury crime of this case, which committed a serious injury on the part of the victim due to the instant special injury on the grounds of the judgment of unfair sentencing, was considerably limited to the Defendant’s liability for the crime of injury on the part of the victim, which committed a serious injury on the part of the victim due to the Defendant’s satisfying of head due to the satisfy’s illness, and the Defendant already had eight criminal records related to violence

On the other hand, the defendant is against the charge by recognizing the facts charged, and the victim's agreement with the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and the family members and branch members of the defendant want to take the action against the defendant.

In addition, the defendant has no record of being sentenced to suspended sentence or heavier punishment.

In addition, in full view of all the conditions of sentencing indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, occupation, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate, and it is not recognized that it is too heavy or unreasonable.

4. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so ordered.