The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. No person who outlines the facts charged shall distribute information with a content that arouses fear or apprehensions through an information and communications network to reach other persons repeatedly in the form of code, text, sound, image, or picture;

Nevertheless, on June 11, 2016, the Defendant sent a text message to the victim C using his mobile phone (B) at an insular phone at around 12:45 on June 11, 2016, stating, “I would like to have been punished for the aged and his family members, and to have been punished for the elderly, and to have the strings and the strings. I would like to have the same, so I would be legally responsible for the strings ins and the strings.” The Defendant sent a text message to the victim and his family members, including the following: from September 27, 2015 to July 31, 2016:

The victim reached the victim.

2. According to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, sending the victims the text message, such as the list of crimes, should be deemed as having made a legitimate objection against the victims. The contents of the message do not include some parts using the text message (e.g., “the same part as the victim,” etc.) but the overall purpose of the message is to take legal measures such as holding the victims who had the face-to-face personal injury liable for the future accusation, and it cannot be deemed as having caused fear or apprehension to the extent contrary to social rules (in particular, the Defendant, at the time, made the face-to-face personal injury and made the face-to-face personal injury to the victims, but the Defendant’s text will not be deemed as having taken legal measures against the victims who had the face-to-face personal injury.