A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 31, 2012, the Defendant considered that the Maart operated under the name of the Defendant was not settled in the course of the victim’s taking over the Maart operated under the past Defendant’s name at Emart work around 21:20 on August 31, 2012, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire with the above Emart, with the victim’s “nick, Chewing, and 34cm in total length” (11cm in daily length, 11cm in total length) and expressed at the same time, and expressed the victim’s desire to purchase one point for the victim’s body, and landed it on the house floor, and then expressed the attitude of threatening the victim’s body, such as making two times the Bash in the above Bash.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement to the effect that he has taken a confluence by hand at the date and place of the ruling;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Articles 3(1) and 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The decision of the suspension of execution shall be made in accordance with the order, taking into consideration the reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act and the health status of