logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2020.01.08 2019고단1317
특수공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant had a weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to the administration of philophones.

피고인은 2019. 4. 2. 07:00경 대구 서구 B, 2층에 있는 피고인의 거주지에서 스스로 112 신고를 하고, 현장에 출동한 대구서부경찰서 C지구대 소속 경위 D, 순경 E에게 “다 돌아가라, 이 씨발 나는 죽을 거다. 가스를 틀어 놨다. 다 폭발시키겠다.”라고 고함을 지르고, 그곳에 있던 위험한 물건인 식칼(총길이 약 29.5cm, 칼날길이 약 18cm)을 피고인의 목 부위 등에 갖다 대며 재차 “올라오지 마라. 죽어버린다. 가스를 틀어 놨다. 다 폭발시키겠다.”라고 고함을 지르고, 이를 말리는 위 D, E을 향해 위 식칼을 들고 위아래로 흔드는 등 협박하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The police seizure record and the list and photographs of seizure; and

1. Work site in the C District;

1. Investigation report (limited to attachment to a list of 112 reported cases);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a suspect on the attachment of a written opinion on the status of the victim

1. Articles 144(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 10 (2) and (1) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of mental disorders;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 44-2 of the Medical Treatment and Custody Act;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted as to the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Code of Confiscation, asserted that the defendant and his defense counsel had a state of mental disorder by philophones at the time of committing the crime of this case. However, according to the above evidence,

arrow