logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.24 2017가단5114064
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 6,201,205 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from August 21, 2015 to August 24, 2018.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. At the time of August 21, 2015, the Plaintiff was a five-year student of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D Elementary School C, and around 12:20-12:40 on the same day, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the wife of the fourth-year student E, who was in the vicinity of the tree located in school correction, etc., with the wind that the Plaintiff’s end up to the ground floor was shocking to the Plaintiff’s end, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) After the instant accident, the Plaintiff received treatment, such as the fixed line of the Legman’s lecture from October 26, 2016 to the time of the instant accident, including the treatment of the leutical, balconium, and the treatment of the leutical and renald water.

3) The Defendant is the insurer of the “Frush Family Loss Compensation Liability Insurance” (FF of the policyholder E) whose family members are insured, and is liable for the payment of insurance proceeds within the limit of KRW 100 million with respect to legal liability for damages incurred by the E’s family members’ physical and property due to a sudden accident in their daily lives. [The Defendant is the insurer who is liable for the payment of insurance proceeds within the limit of KRW 100,000,000, not

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages incurred by E due to the instant accident within the limit of KRW 100 million pursuant to the above liability insurance contract and Article 724(2) of the Commercial Act.

2. In addition to the scope of damages, all the separate statements are as shown in the separate sheet of calculation of damages. A.

The plaintiff is a woman of Girs with operational ability corresponding to an urban ordinary person after the operation period, and the labor ability loss rate due to the accident in this case shall be 0.15% due to the malfunction.

[Grounds for recognition] Class A and Class 1 and Class 2 shall be respectively.

arrow