Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is operating a restaurant "D" on the left-hand side of the cafeteria "C" operated by the victim B (46).

1) On June 4, 2015, the Defendant collected 23:59 on June 4, 2015, 2015, 2.2 (2.70cm in diameter, 7.5cm in diameter, 6.5cm in diameter, 2.2 (2.70cm in diameter x 100cc x 270cc x 270cc x 5050cc x 500,000 won in total) of the market price of the 52.4.7 million won in a water tank (2.75cm in diameter, 6.5cm in thickness) where the victim’s water tank was operated by the victim Nonparty E, and the Defendant reported that F and the victim’s f who was in a gambling store near C immediately adjacent to C, at low on the same day, did so.

2) Defendant 1 attempted to destroy the water capacity of the victim at the time, at the place, as described in the above 1) above, after destroying the water capacity of the victim as described in the above 1) above, and continuously using it within the D cafeteria operated by the victim, twice the water capacity installed at the right side of the C gate, and one time the water capacity installed on the left side of the C gate was destroyed, but the water capacity fell short of the glass of the water capacity and did not result in an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant’s legal statement B, investigation report (in addition to field photographs, etc.), investigation report (in relation to hearing of the other party to the victim’s wife and on-site photographs), investigation report (in relation to submission of written estimates, etc. for damages), investigation report (in relation to attachment of CCTV photographs and the location of the suspect), attachment of investigation report (in relation to the attachment of CCTV photographs and the location of the suspect), Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the criminal facts subject to the applicable Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation report (in relation to the victim’s statement hearing), Article 371 and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (in relation to property damage, selection of fines), Article 371 and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (in relation to attempted destruction of property, selection of fines), Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act aggravated by concurrent crimes.