Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 11, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 by the Seoul Central District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On September 2, 2011, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Seoul Northern District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and is a person who is engaged in driving of the B-hand vehicle.

On March 26, 2013, at around 01:00, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.096% of alcohol concentration, and led to the driving of the said car at a speed of 80 kilometers per hour according to 80 kilometers in front of 173-8, Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Nowon-gu, Seoul, the 8-do 173-do 173-do 17, both ICT and the 4-lane.

In such a case, although a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle on the front side and prevent an accident in advance, the defendant was negligent in neglecting his/her duty of care while driving the motor vehicle in front of the same lane, and due to the negligence of driving the motor vehicle in front of the same lane, he/she received the part behind the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle in front of the victim E (32 years old) who sent the same lane in front of the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle in front, and continued to drive the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle in front of the defendant's driver in front of the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle in front of the victim's 47 years old and followed the part behind the victim's Hak9 (47 years old) in front of the motor vehicle in front of the above vehicle in front of the victim in front.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in performing the above occupational duties that requires approximately 6 weeks of injury to C, such as external malute, etc., of the critical signboard that requires treatment for approximately 2 weeks to E and G, and that the Defendant’s injury, such as climatic salt, etc., requires treatment for about 3 days to the victim K (V, 28 years of age) who is the above taxi passenger.