1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added in the trial are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

The court's explanation of this case is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for adding the judgment as to the plaintiff's conjunctive claim as set forth in paragraph (2) below, and thus citing this case pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff’s additional determination was made on November 25, 201 as a member of “D” (hereinafter “the instant group”), which is a group of members of “D” (hereinafter “the instant group”), but discontinued activities after the Japanese performance around February 2012 at the end of the enemy’s response that was continued due to the failure to obtain human seal to the public. As such, the Plaintiff was able to provide the Defendant with the training after the discontinuance of the activities, rather than the “ongoing training and education” rather than the “ongoing training and education.”

Therefore, since the Defendant’s failure to work in the Plaintiff’s office without permission after November 2013 constitutes an act of unilaterally refusing education and training, and constitutes a violation of the instant exclusive agreement, the Defendant is obligated to pay twice the sum of the direct and indirect costs invested by the Defendant in entertainment activities and the labor cost of the invested personnel during the contract period, which is double the sum of the labor cost of the Defendant’s entertainment activities and the invested personnel.

Judgment

According to Article 5 of the instant exclusive agreement, the Plaintiff provided or entrusted all education to the Defendant for the acquisition and improvement of the necessary ability.

2. Negotiations and conclusion of contracts for entertainment activities;

3. Contribution and negotiation to media;

4. Publicity and advertisement of entertainment activities;

5.The receipt and management of payments from a third party for entertainment activities by the Defendant;

6. Planning, organization, production, schedule management of entertainment activities;

7. planning, production, distribution and sale of contents;

8. At the same time, the Defendant holds a “right” to exclusively carry out support for the Defendant’s entertainment activities, and at the same time bears the obligation to provide the above management services for the Defendant.