logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.08.16 2019고정600
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 24, 2018, from around 21:10 to 21:50, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as spiting the victim’s face, spiting the victim’s bat, bating the bat around the D store operated by the victim C (50 years of age) in Incheon Jung-gu, and the Furway operated by the Defendant in the same Gu E, and bating the victim’s face, and bating the victim’s bat with the victim’s hand, and bating the victim’s bat with the victim’s bat with the victim’s hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and G;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. The CD [the defendant and his defense counsel] asserts that the defendant was unilaterally assaulted by the victim, and that there was no assault against the victim. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim was relatively consistent and concrete from investigation agency to investigation agency, to this court, and even according to the CCTV images at the time, the defendant was found to have been humped against the defendant's body down to the lower body part of the victim's body, and even according to the CCTV images at the time, it is confirmed that the defendant was humped against the victim's body down from the floor, and that the witness's testimony is supported by the witness's legal statement (G is also aware of both as a resident living together with the defendant and the victim, and it seems that there is no special relationship with the victim, and there seems to be no reason to make a false statement with the defendant even when he was held liable for criminal liability pursuant to the above evidence.

The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion that denies the assault is not accepted.

Furthermore, even if the defendant assaulted the victim as stated in its reasoning, and the defendant was also subject to violence from the victim and was injured, the person who conducts the same fighting.

arrow