beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.
However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
No one shall engage in a similar receiving business of raising funds, such as receiving investments from many and unspecified persons, under the agreement to pay the total amount of investments or an amount in excess thereof in the future without obtaining authorization or permission or making registration or report.
Defendant
A is the head of the administrative branch office of H(Co., Ltd. I, J.) and the defendant B is the adviser of the above company.
The Defendants, along with K, etc., who is the representative of the above company, committed similar receiving acts such as receiving investments from many unspecified persons by explaining the business that “as a result, after acquiring a company, pay a few times the amount of investment made by raising the stock price, and pay recommended allowances when recruiting investors.”
The Defendants, at the “M office” office located on the Cheongju-si L and the 2nd floor around January 29, 2015 without obtaining authorization, permission, or filing a registration report, the Defendants, “If an investment is made, the Defendants will receive dividends from N to two to ten times the amount of the investment would be raised after the acquisition of the company by such money, and the share price would be raised, and 100% will be refunded if a refund is requested.
If a person takes advantage of another person and makes an investment, 10% of the investment amount shall be 10% of the investment amount. The investment amount of KRW 20,000,000 from N to J’s bank account (Account Number:O) was received from N in the same manner as the total amount of KRW 3,139,877,000,00, from March 28, 2013 to March 31, 2015, was received from N in the same manner as in the attached list of crimes (Provided, That “501 to 524” as stated in the column of “number” was changed to “450 to 473”).
As a result, the Defendants conspired with K, etc. to receive a similar act.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant A’s legal statement
1. Defendant B’s legal statement (as at the fifth public trial date);
1. Witnesses' testimony in P, Q, R and S;
1. A protocol concerning each of the police suspects against K, T, or U;
1. Each police officer for N,V, and W.