logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.05.22 2019고정129
전기통신사업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator or provide such services for a third party's communications.

Nevertheless, the defendant will pay 400,000 won per unit of cell phone on the condition of six-month use from the person who was infinite who was contacted by Internet search while taking advantage of the loan around August 2017.

“In receipt of the proposal, “A” was prepared by receiving two copies of the application for mobile phone subscription from Kwikset Service Articles, which had been sent by the above winners of Kwikset Service, around 17:00 on August 16, 2017, and around 17:00, from Kwikset Service Articles, and then allowing him/her to open one mobile phone at D around August 18, 2017, and from G mobile phone from F on the same day. On September 19, 2017, he/she would pay 4.50,000 won per mobile phone from the above person without the name of the deceased.

"Around September 20, 2017, with the proposal and the prior documents submitted by the above person, he/she may open H mobile phone only from F to H mobile phone around September 20, 2017, from I to J mobile phone only from Sep. 21, 2017, and from other person under his/her name to Nov. 20, 2017, he/she shall pay 2.50,000 won per unit of telephone on the condition of four months." Upon receipt of the proposal, he/she prepared an application for his/her namelight box or cell phone joining around the defendant's residence located in Ansan-gu, Seosan-gu, Busan, and prepared an application for his/her mobile phone joining at around 17:00 and then made the above person under his/her name light to use his/her mobile phone around 1 D on November 23, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant provided five mobile phones, which are telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators, for another's communication purpose.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police interrogation protocol against the defendant - list of evidence.

arrow