logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.08.17 2017고정195
업무방해
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who works as executive director of the cooperative C, was ordered by D, the chairman of the above cooperative, to block electricity supplied on the street store that is not a member of the E market merchants' association, and instructed F, an employee of the above cooperative, to block electricity supplied on the street store of the victim G, who did not join the said merchant's association, to encourage F to block electricity supplied on the street store of the above victim.

Around 08:30 on July 6, 2016, the above F sent electricity to the Defendant for the reason that the victim, who operates the street store in the E market, did not join the E market merchants' association and did not refuse to pay management expenses, such as cleaning expenses, etc., and the victim could not use electricity around July 6, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant instigated FF to interfere with the victim's business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement (the purport that he was not only a person who delivered D's instructions to F)

1. Each legal statement of witness G and F;

1. Partial statement of the witness D;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A summary of the emergency countermeasure committee;

1. Each letter of agreement (AC Cooperatives Chairperson D directed the Defendant to a short time against the street shop shop shop that is not affiliated with E market merchants' associations, and the Defendant directed the F, who is an employee affiliated with C Cooperatives, to a short time against the victim, and F, as stated in its reasoning, took a short time measure against the victim.

As such, the Defendant, while giving F instructions, embodyed D instructions, and did not know D’s intent.

F resolved to commit a crime of interference with business as stated in its reasoning after receiving the direction of the defendant.

Thus, the defendant's act as stated in its holding shall be deemed as a so-called "dual teacher" as a so-called "dual teacher."

another.

arrow